Insurance Company Ratings

Valuations of insurance companies

New Zealand AIG Insurance Ltd. New Zealand Ltd. AA/STABIL. for insurance companies. A.

M. Best Company, Inc, www.ambest. com, Ambest Rd. The Intact Financial Corporation (IFC) is the leading provider of property and casualty insurance in Canada.

Financial ratings of the insurance company

An important consideration to consider when choosing an insurance company is the insurer's credit rating. We have four large financials firms that issue ratings from US insurance firms. including Fitch Ratings, A.M. Best, Standard and Poor's and Moody's. There are three firms (Fitch, S&P and Moody's) that offer finance ratings for both insurance underwriters and other kinds of firms.

A. M. Only the best insurance can do. Either of the four firms has devised a valuation system that uses one or more alphabetical characters to describe an insurer's situation. Ratings usually vary from "excellent" or "better" to "bad" or "desperate". "While enterprises use similar information to compute their ratings, no two schemes are the same.

When evaluating an insurance company, ratings organisations take both quantitative and quantitative aspects into account. Quantifiable elements are the insurer's profit and loss account, its financial statements and its claims and expenses ratio. The company's corporate ethos, the workmanship of the company's managers and the willingness to take risks can all be decisive qualities. Credit agencies shall provide several ratings for each underwriter.

A credit assessment could cover the solvency of an insurance company, while another could cover its capacity to repay long-term debts. Key financials of the four entities are presented in the following chart. Evaluations under B (or C+) were not taken into account. Evaluations appearing on the same line do not mean that they are even.

S&P' s AA credit score, for example, may differ slightly from that of Moody's Aa. Given that the ratings regimes are different, it is advisable to consider ratings from several different origins when assessing an underwriter. Extraordinary capability to fulfil outstanding commitmentsExcellent capability to fulfil current commitmentsExtremely powerful prudential features. Top S&P Ratings Extraordinary pecuniary certainty.

Basically powerful marketplace. Extremely powerful capability to fulfill pecuniary obligationsCompanies with an A+ rating are a "notch" lower than those awarded A++Very powerful features of pecuniary securityExcellent pecuniary soundness. A good level of pecuniary safety. Our ratings for our financials are "future-oriented". "In other words, they are forecasts of the insurance companies' capability in the near term to fulfil their financing liabilities.

The main duty of an insurance company is to pay claims to (or on account of) policy holders. Insurance companies may also have treaty commitments to reinsurance companies and other third party providers. Ratings used by ECAIs are quite diverse, and each is likely to cover a large number of insurance providers.

Thus, for example, hundred of insurance firms can be qualified for S&P's AA ratings. Although these insurance providers have certain characteristics, they are not the same as the insurance providers for solvency risk. The ratings of the insurance undertakings mirror the insurance undertakings' performance. It is not a yardstick for the qualitiy of insurers' benefits in processing losses. Being able to settle damages does not mean that an insurance company will do so in an efficient or effective way.

Auch interessant

Mehr zum Thema